📘 Important Issues in Girish Karnad’s Play Tughlaq
Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq (1964) is one of the most
powerful modern Indian plays written in English.
It is based on the historical ruler Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq, who
ruled Delhi (1325–1351).
The play explores how a ruler’s noble dreams of justice and unity
collapse into madness and tyranny.
Each issue reflects both the 14th century Delhi
Sultanate and modern India, especially Nehru’s
idealistic but troubled period after independence.
![]()
⚖️ 1. Idealism vs. Reality
➤ Description:
Tughlaq is presented as a highly intelligent and
idealistic ruler.
He dreams of building a perfect state based on:
- Justice and
equality,
- Religious
tolerance (Hindus and Muslims living together),
- Rationality
and reason over blind faith.
He says,
“I want to make this country worthy of its past glory.”
However, his noble ideals fail when they
meet the harsh realities of human greed, fear, and resistance
to change.
➤ Example:
- The shift of capital from Delhi to Daulatabad
was meant to bring Hindus and Muslims closer — but it caused immense
suffering.
- The copper coin experiment was
a brilliant idea — but common people exploited it for forgery.
➤ Message:
Karnad shows that idealism without practical wisdom
becomes destructive.
Tughlaq’s failure reflects how visionary leaders can become tragic
figures when they lose touch with the people.
![]()
🕌 2. Religion and Politics
➤ Description:
One of the central issues in Tughlaq is the relationship
between religion and politics.
Tughlaq tries to create a secular state, separating political
authority from religious control.
He respects all religions — a revolutionary idea in the 14th century.
However, his actions often contradict his words.
He uses religion to strengthen his political power and silences religious
critics like Sheikh Imam-ud-din.
➤ Example:
- Tughlaq
orders the murder of the Sheikh, a
pious cleric who condemns his policies.
- He quotes the Quran to
justify his violent actions.
- His use of religious language hides
political cruelty.
➤ Message:
Karnad suggests that mixing religion with politics
leads to hypocrisy and corruption.
A ruler who uses religion for political gain ultimately destroys both
faith and governance.
![]()
👑 3. Power and Corruption
➤ Description:
Tughlaq’s journey from an idealistic ruler to a cruel,
suspicious dictator shows how absolute power corrupts
absolutely.
In the beginning, he wants to rule through reason and justice, but later, power
and failure make him tyrannical and paranoid.
➤ Example:
- He kills his
step-mother, though he loves her, to maintain “justice.”
- He executes
the Amirs who rebel against him.
- He trusts no
one, not even Barani, his loyal historian.
➤ Message:
Karnad shows that intelligence without morality
can destroy a leader.
Power turns Tughlaq’s rationality into madness and cruelty.
![]()
💔 4. Madness and Isolation
➤ Description:
As Tughlaq’s dreams fail, he becomes mentally
unstable and emotionally isolated.
He cannot trust anyone; everyone fears him.
He lives surrounded by death, silence, and guilt.
➤ Example:
- The step-mother’s death leaves
him utterly alone.
- His final
prayer scene shows him talking
to himself, disconnected from reality.
- The muezzin’s call and his
broken prayer blend, symbolizing his spiritual collapse.
➤ Message:
Tughlaq’s madness is both personal and political.
It represents how visionary leaders can lose their sanity when their ideals are
betrayed by real-world failures.
![]()
🩸 5. Betrayal and Hypocrisy
➤ Description:
The play is full of betrayals — political,
personal, and moral.
Even the Sultan, who begins with pure motives, becomes the greatest betrayer of
all — betraying his own ideals.
➤ Example:
- The Amirs betray the Sultan
through rebellion.
- The step-mother betrays him by
killing Najib.
- Aziz, a common man, betrays faith and religion by using
them for profit.
- Finally, Tughlaq betrays his people,
his religion, and his own conscience.
➤ Message:
Karnad portrays betrayal as an inevitable result of corruption
and idealism gone wrong.
No one remains innocent in Tughlaq’s world.
![]()
💰 6. Failure of Leadership
➤ Description:
Tughlaq’s leadership fails because he tries to impose
change too quickly without understanding his people.
He expects his subjects to be as rational and visionary as he is — but they are
poor, fearful, and traditional.
➤ Example:
- The forced
migration and copper currency cause suffering.
- His dream of
unity ends in chaos,
revolt, and famine.
➤ Message:
A ruler must understand the pulse of the people,
not just the logic of ideas.
Tughlaq’s failure shows that leadership without empathy leads to destruction.
![]()
🧑🤝🧑 7. Common People and Exploitation
➤ Description:
The common people suffer the most in Tughlaq’s reign.
They are used, manipulated, and destroyed by both rulers and opportunists like Aziz
and Aazam.
The masses’ pain reflects the human cost of political ambition.
➤ Example:
- The long,
deadly march from Delhi to Daulatabad.
- The
counterfeiting of copper coins that destroys common livelihoods.
- Aziz’s
exploitation of religion to rob innocent believers.
➤ Message:
Karnad exposes the exploitation of the poor
under high-sounding political reforms.
He shows that political “progress” often happens at the expense of the
powerless.
![]()
🧩 8. Irony and Tragic Vision
➤ Description:
Tughlaq is filled with irony
— the gap between what the Sultan intends and what actually happens.
His every good reform brings disaster.
➤ Examples of
Irony:
|
Reform |
Intended
Outcome |
Actual Result |
|
Capital
shift to Daulatabad |
Hindu–Muslim
unity |
Mass
death and displacement |
|
Copper
currency |
Economic
equality |
Economic
chaos |
|
Religious
tolerance |
Peace |
Violence
and murder |
|
Justice |
Fairness |
Cruel
executions |
➤ Message:
Karnad builds a tragic irony: the most
intelligent ruler becomes the most hated and insane one.
The play is not only the tragedy of Tughlaq but of human idealism
itself.
![]()
🔮 9. Symbolism
Karnad uses rich symbols throughout the
play to deepen its meaning:
|
Symbol |
Meaning |
|
Delhi → Daulatabad |
The
journey from dream to destruction; forced unity |
|
Copper Coins |
False
equality; moral corruption |
|
Deserted Delhi |
Death
of civilization and ideals |
|
Prayer Scene (End) |
Collapse
of faith; merging of divine and madness |
|
Aziz and Aazam |
Opportunism
and corruption in society |
![]()
⚙️ 10. Relevance to Modern India
Although set in the 14th century, Tughlaq mirrors post-independence
India under Jawaharlal Nehru:
- Nehru’s dream
of a secular, modern India parallels Tughlaq’s vision.
- Both are rational, idealistic, and visionary,
but their plans face practical
chaos.
- The play
warns that idealism without political wisdom
can lead to disaster.
![]()
💡 Conclusion
Tughlaq is not just a
historical play — it is a political and psychological tragedy.
It shows how a man with extraordinary vision can destroy himself when idealism
becomes arrogance and reason loses touch with humanity.
Through Tughlaq’s fall, Karnad explores:
- The failure
of leadership,
- The misuse of
religion,
- The tragedy
of ambition, and
- The eternal
conflict between dreams
and reality.
Tughlaq’s story remains a timeless warning for every age
and every ruler.